Improving Interface Design
From: garrettdimon, 2 years ago
Web Visions 2007 Improving Interface Design Workshop
SlideShare Link





The goal is quite simple: Explore the difference between your real self in the society and your digital self on the Internet. The method is even simpler: by analyzing people’s daily browsing activities. I plan to build this piece by Processing(as usual), the final delivery will be an “artistic” interactive piece.
So what’s a Digital Self and why start from a web browsing history analysis?
People may scared if they realized that their browser knows themselves more than they do. The browser traced down every single activity you do on the Internet, that somehow reflects you as a whole slightly different than you are in the real world.
For example, here are some variables that may reflects your “Internet” personality.
Your most frequent visiting sites.
- If I ask you to list some favorite sites, the answer you give me might be different than the answer given by your browser. You may not realize why you actually spend 30 hours on Facebook monthly, that conflicts with your goal - study harder.
How long do you stay at a site
- Spending 10 hours shopping on Amazon and 10 seconds to check things on Amazon reflects different personalities. If we did a long-term research, you may find you are easily obsessed with one thing, or you may like to change your focus frequently. That’s a very interesting Internet personality.
Your browsing time
- This directly reflects your schedule, how busy you are.
Sites category you visited over time
- When you are relax and happy, you will visit a lot of sites you like, otherwise, if you are hitting a deadline, you will only visit sites related to your work. However the sites people visit reflects how they release their pressure, such as watching a cartoon after a long time work.
Your search result
- Reflects your curiosity
What do you tag or bookmark a page
- This may reflect your Internet self in a social context.
What much do you comment or upload things on Internet(In versus Out)?
- If you only get, never give, does that mean you have a selfish personality on the Internet?
…
It will be interesitng to build a framework for Internet Self Study, but I think that’s phychologists’ job.
Sebascion S's comments:
Good idea though I do believe Google has long ago started a search project on just that. I had a suggestion though; by categorizing pages and relating them with each other and perhaps pushing it further enough to relate them to moods, wouldn’t it be possible to form a happy pattern that could suggest pages to cheer somebody up(?). Come up with a colorful design that transpires joy(or perhaps color patterns that can be somewhat customized) that would show up in a cloud fashion the websites that would be interesting to the user. Is it possible to maybe add suggestions (delicious….) that would add up to this cloud and would be highlighted to show that they are suggestions.
This is my dataset(It contains more than 5,000 items). It's about my own browsing history and bookmarks collection. Soon I'll get other people's browsing history as well.Here is my info for this part of the project. I think that I am not sure that MPAA ratings fall into heirarchy. I think I may move this to category. Although people may classify this as a heirarchy.
3 Types of data
1. Movie Performance (sales volume, weekly sales, box office rating, movie title)
2. MPAA Ratings (MPAA ratings)
3. Audience Ratings (Average viewer rating, movie title)
Organize according to LATCH
1. Movie Performance
a. Alphabetical: movie title
b. Time: all-time, yearly, monthly, weekly, release date, movie length
c. Category: genre, sales
d. Hierarchy: top ten movies
2. MPAA Ratings
a. Alphabetical: movie title
b. Category: genre
c. Hierarchy: MPAA Ratings (G, PG, PG-13, R, NC-17)
3. Audience Ratings
a. Alphabetical: movie title
b. Category: genre, number of reviews, average viewer rating
Temporal Map / Groups of Info
Release Date: Last week | Last 30 days – current week | Last 365 days – current 30 days | Previous
Genre: comedy | romantic | horror |action | sci-fi | foreign
Movie sales rating: 1 - 10 | 11 - 50 | 50 - 100
Average viewer rating: 1-5 | 5 <>= 7
MPAA Ratings: G | PG | PG-13 | R | NC – 17
Movie Title: A – G | H – M | N – Z ** Will have to look at movie titles an first letter frequency
Again, the primary goal of this project is to compare when and where books are written to when and where they take place. These are possible organizational methods for each LATCH principle:
Location:
City by city; By region/country; Limit to books in one region/country; English-speaking countries; Throughout the universe, By the distance from where the book was written to where it is set
Alphabetical:
By book title; By author's name
Time:
By year; By decade; By the difference between the year the book is written and the year it's set
Categorical:
By genre, By language, By author's birthplace, By tone, Past vs. present vs. future, Non-fiction vs. fiction, Fictional settings vs. real settings
Hierarchy:
Place written, place set-->time written, time set-->genre
Location and time will be most important because they directly relate to the primary data. Providing different categories like genre or time change would provide secondary functions to explore trends in the data. One challenge will be that the data doesn't not all have the same accuracy. One book could be set in Manhattan in 1987 and another across Europe over three decades.
Visualizing movement through space and time (both forwards and back) will be big a challenge as well. One way to do it is with a map with symbols or colors that indicate time change, or conversely, a timeline that uses symbols to indicate a change in place (this would probably be harder). Another way to visualize this is to make a three dimensional map, where time is the third dimension. A top view would isolate the location variable and a side view would isolate time variable.